If a person goes to a casino and places all of his worldly assets on a single throw of the dice or a single game of cards and loses, does he have the right to demand that the casino return his assets?
This is the result of a similar decision by your forebears, whether you parents, grandparents of great-grandparents. think about this very carefully while you read the rest of this post.
First and foremost, your government, such as it is, has to publicly abandon this declared objective:
There will never be a Palestine replacing Israel at any time. The massive land and asset theft this entails will never happen.
Your parents, grandparents or great grandparents made a decision and took action on that decision… to refuse to allow the Jewish state to be established on 11.5% of the League of Nations Mandate for Palestine.
This was the original Mandate for Palestine in 1920:
In 1922, Great Britain chopped off 77% of the Mandate to present to Abdullah bin al-Husseini for two purposes:
As a consolation prize for losing the crown of Hejaz to the ibn Saud clan (the area now known as “Saudi Arabia”), and;
As a bribe so that Abdullah wouldn’t attempt to take the Iraqi crown of his younger brother, Faisal.
One year later, the Brits illegally ceded the Golan Heights from the Mandate for Palestine to the Mandate for Syria/Lebanon, held by France in direct violation of the terms of the Mandate for Palestine, specifically, Article 5:
“Art. 5. The Mandatory [Great Britain] shall be responsible for seeing that no Palestine territory shall be ceded or leased to, or in any way placed under the control of the Government of any foreign Power”.
This left 22% of the original Mandate for the Jewish homeland while creating an Arab state that had never previously existed at the expense of the Mandate for Palestine, leaving this:
The Mandatory created two bodies of the local population, the Higher Arab Committee for Palestine and the Yishuv, the Jewish equivalent. Both were intended to be “shadow governments” in order to learn the workings of maintaining a viable nation-state entity.
That the Arabs of Palestine weren’t interested in any co-existence with the Jewish population of Palestine became obvious from a very early date with the riot and massacre of Jews at Nebi Musa on May 1, 1920, when Arabs, incited by Haj Amin al-Husseini attacked a Jewish Labor Day parade, believing his claims that “the Jews are murdering Arabs at al-Aqsa””.
Anti-Jewish riots continued irregularly, until the massacres in Hebron and Safed in 1929 made it quite plain that there would be no Arab acceptance of any kind of Jewish entity unless it was as Dhimmi.
During the Arab riots of 1936 to 1939, there were four options presented to both sides for partitioning between the two:
The Peel Commission in 1937, which the Jews accepted and the Arabs rejected:
then there was the Woodhead Commission in 1939, which presented three options for partition. All were accepted by the Jews and rejected by the Arabs:
Immediately after WWII, an additional proposal was made by the Anglo-American Committee, once again, accepted by the Jews and rejected by the Arabs:
On November 29, 1947, the UN General Assembly voted on this proposal for the Partition of Palestine, which was once again accepted by the Jews and rejected by the Arabs… this time not only by the Arabs of Palestine, but by the six Arab states of the Arab League: Egypt, Iraq, Transjordan (renamed Jordan in 1949), Saudi Arabia and Syria. These states rejected the resolution in its entirety, violating their commitment to the UN Charter, and swore that the Jewish state would never exist.
This was probably the worst of the partition plans, turning the Mandate for Palestine into a jigsaw puzzle with three separate pieces for the “Jewish state” mentioned no less than 30 times and another three separate pieces for the “Arab state”, mentioned no less than 22 times in the resolution.
Jerusalem was intended t be a “corpus separatum” (separated body) for ten years, administered by the UN, with a decision on the permanent status to come as the result of a referendum of the citizens of the two countries.
The day after the UN vote, on November 30, 1947, the Arabs in Palestine embarked on a civil was intended to drive the Jews out of Palestine. When it became obvious that the Arabs of Palestine weren’t capable of doing this, even with the assistance of the “Arab Liberation Army from Syria led by
So, on May 15, the day after the end of the Mandate for Palestine, Egyptian, Jordanian, Syrian and Lebanese troops, supported by Iraq and Saudi Arabia attacked Israel from four directions with the declared objective of eliminating the newly-born Jewish state.
They failed. Their failure was more due to mistrust between the leaders, corruption in the various militaries and a lack of motivation among the troops than it was to any Israeli heroics or “miracles”.
The only Arab army that had any gains was the Jordanian Army, trained by the British and commanded by British officers, with a British general,
in overall command and British officers mixed with Jordanian officers as far down as the platoon level. Egypt retained the Gaza Strip and treated it like a conquered territory.
Interestingly enough, the PLO waived all claims to those areas in their 1964 Palestinian National Charter:
“Article 24: This Organization does not exercise any territorial sovereignty over the West Bank in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, on the Gaza Strip or in the Himmah [Golan] Area. Its activities will be on the national popular level in the liberational, organizational, political and financial fields”.
So, apparently, the West Bank and Gaza Strip weren’t “Palestinian territory” in the eyes of the PLO until they were no longer under Arab control. This article disappeared from the re-written 1968 Palestinian National Charter after the 6-Day War.
There is, by the way, sufficient evidence to indicate that had the Arab armies been victorious and eliminated Israel in 1948, there still would have been no Palestinian state, the land would have been split between Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Egypt.
Here are some quotes from Arab leaders that you should perhaps be made aware of:
“The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct Palestinian people to oppose Zionism.
“For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan.” – Interview with Zuheir Muhsin, a member of the PLO Executive Council, published in the March 31, 1977 edition of the Dutch Newspaper “Trouw”.
If you ask President Donald Trump, he isn’t racist. To the contrary, he’s repeatedly said that he’s “the least racist person that you’ve ever encountered.” Trump’s actual record, however, tells a very different story. On the campaign trail, Trump repeatedly made explicitly racist and otherwise bigoted remarks, from calling Mexican immigrants criminals and rapists, to proposing a ban on all Muslims entering the US, to suggesting a judge should recuse himself from a case solely because of the judge’s Mexican heritage. The trend has continued into his presidency. From stereotyping a Black reporter to pandering to white supremacists after they held a violent rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, to making a joke about the Trail of Tears , Trump hasn’t stopped with racist acts after his 2016 election. Most recently, Trump has called the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus the “Chinese virus” and “kung flu” — racist terms that tap into the kind of xenophobia that he latched onto during his 2...
https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-55348574 =========== "It is on those who allege that fraud did occur to prove their case, which they have not so far been able to do. It is lso on those who make such allegations to disentangle their claims from any benefit they receive from elevating such claims without evidence." Philip Bump, Washington Post https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/10-voter-fraud-lies-debunked Mail voting has taken on new importance as a crucial strategy for protecting voters’ safety amid the Covid-19 pandemic. As if on cue, President Trump and his surrogates have claimed that mail voting is rife with fraud, and that efforts to expand access to mail voting — like Michigan's , for example — are illegitimate. That is incorrect: as the Brennan Center has explained , fraud in mail voting remains extremely rare, and none of the states that hold their elections primarily by mail have had voter fraud scandals since implementing the systems...
“Food desert.” When I hear that phrase I think of nomads riding bactrian camels across the Nefud in search of ancient grains. But, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, it means that you live more than one mile from a store that sells fresh produce or meat. Hardly the image most of us in tree-covered suburbia think of as a desert. The term, which has only been around about 25 years since being coined in the U.K., has recently attracted the attention of many local politicians who believe they can “out zone” free market forces. Unfortunately for them, Adam Smith’s invisible hand usually tends to win in these situations. The controversy started several years ago when all the cool kids decided that Walmarts were bad for communities. Using various forms of convoluted reasoning, many local governments essentially banned large super stores by enacting zoning size limits. Too big was bad. The stated goal was typically to save small stores from the competition of lar...
Comments
Post a Comment