Jewish question?
If you are implying that Christianity doesn't convict innocent people to die at dozens of times the rate of any other religion, you would be wrong. Each of the Gulf wars was entered into under the name of the Christian god, and asked his blessing. The US killed 2.5 million Muslims in a little more than a decade, all in the name of an imaginary fairy in the sky.
Your knowledge of history also seems to be somewhat lacking. The Jews launched the Holocaust in 1925, as they instituted a decade long economic boycott of German goods that caused a Germany long suffering from WWI war reparations to lose 10% of it’s GDP, leading to an economic catastrophe that caused 300,000 Germans to starve to death.
This was a political battle, until the Jews made it about ethnicity. You cannot show that kind of callous disregard for the well-being of others and not expect a reaction. The Jewish-led economic boycott was started in 1925. Hitler came to power in 1933. Claiming that boycott was a reaction against Hitler is a bit absurdist.
Germany was by far the most progressive and accepting of Jews for all European nations posts WWI. German Jews were in high places economically and socially. They were leaders in government, education, finance, the media, and culture. Most of the established Jews in Germany at that time considered themselves German first and Jews 2nd or 3rd. The infiltrating Bolshevik Jews from Russia however, wanted to turn Germany on its head politically, and those political goals came with a price.
To be clear, the German’s ultimate widespread disdain for the Jewish people had nothing to do with race or religion until the socialist Jews made it about ethnicity by trying to force their radical vision for society onto a Germany that wasn’t ready for it. The conflict was rooted firmly in competing *political* priorities until late in the 1930’s. The German people didn’t turn against the Jews because Hitler was a charismatic speaker, they did so because the Jews were literally killing them in a political power grab.
First those socialist extremists overthrew the conservative German government at the end of WWI, then they fought dirty for their political ideals through things such as the ill-timed economic boycott. All was going well for them until German’s economy worsened, and the political climate took a hard and quick turn to the Right.
The socialist Jews assumed they had more political capital than they actually did. Instead of backing down to the changing tides, they kept the political and economic pressure on. By contrast, the Jews at the top of the economic and social spectrum assumed they were bullet-proof because they were loyal Germans who weren’t part of that political circus.
Hitler had 3 clearly articulated main priorities from the beginning:
- revise the Treaty of Versailles.
- unite all German-speaking people into one Reich.
- expand eastwards to achieve Lebensraum.
How do any of those priorities support the narrative that Hitler’s goal from the beginning was the extermination of the Jewish people? In all his vast writings to his most trusted friends and colleagues, Hitler never once mentions extermination of the Jewish people. That’s an odd fact to try to dance around. If that’s where his mind was, you would have thought he would have mentioned it at least once.
Time and time again, Hitler’s stated goal was to end the political extortion and to reclaim the German Republic for the German people. Instead of responding to the Jewish terrorism with more violence, he sought for 3 long years to exile those rabble rousing enemies of the state. He allowed them free passage out of the country, instead of a lengthy prison sentence. That’s more than most world leaders would have done. It was only when the socialists doubled down with their attacks against a Germany that was slowly starving to death that Hitler started putting the screws to them. Ultimately, the economic boycott turned out to be the first shot fired in the Holocaust. Without it, there would have been no Holocaust.
There is no logic behind anyone suggesting that Germany was ethically obliged to starve to death instead of being rightfully upset that their beloved country was being strangled to death by deeply ideological, deeply socialist Jewish infiltrators. History is complicated and messy. Stop trying to cram it to fit within your biases.
Comments
Post a Comment